QUESTION IMAGE
Question
assessment
- apply concepts how did france’s social divisions in the late 1700s contribute to the revolution?
- draw conclusions why was the conflict between the clergy and the third estate the most divisive in the course of the revolution?
- compare how might the complaints of a peasant and a merchant compare during the revolution?
- identify cause and effect what characteristics of the third estate helped fuel the revolution?
- connect what did the tennis court oath foretell about the coming events of the french revolution?
1. Apply Concepts: How did France’s social divisions in the late 1700s contribute to the revolution?
France had three estates: clergy (1st), nobility (2nd), and commoners (3rd). The 3rd Estate (most people) paid heavy taxes, had little power, while 1st/2nd had privileges. This inequality (economic, political) led to resentment, fueling the revolution.
The clergy (1st Estate) was allied with nobility, sharing privileges and opposing Third Estate’s demands. The Third Estate sought equality, so conflict with clergy (a symbol of old regime privilege) highlighted class divisions, making it highly divisive.
Both peasants and merchants (Third Estate) disliked old regime inequality. Peasants’ complaints: feudal dues, heavy taxes, lack of land. Merchants’ complaints: trade restrictions, nobility/clergy privileges limiting economic growth. Both wanted political/economic reform.
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
France’s social divisions (three estates) created inequality: the Third Estate (commoners) bore heavy taxes, lacked political power, while the First (clergy) and Second (nobility) had privileges. This injustice fueled resentment, driving the revolution.