oscar claims that employee benefits have little impact on lifetime income so one should only consider a job…

oscar claims that employee benefits have little impact on lifetime income so one should only consider a job with the largest salary. which statement about his claim is true?\nhe is correct because a larger salary would allow one to save more money for retirement.\nhe is correct because benefits have no monetary value to an employee even though the employer may pay for them.\nhe is incorrect because health insurance will save the employee money he could apply to retirement.\nhe is incorrect because the employer gives the money for benefits directly to the employee so the employee can use the money as he wishes.

oscar claims that employee benefits have little impact on lifetime income so one should only consider a job with the largest salary. which statement about his claim is true?\nhe is correct because a larger salary would allow one to save more money for retirement.\nhe is correct because benefits have no monetary value to an employee even though the employer may pay for them.\nhe is incorrect because health insurance will save the employee money he could apply to retirement.\nhe is incorrect because the employer gives the money for benefits directly to the employee so the employee can use the money as he wishes.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Employee benefits like health - insurance can save money that can be used for retirement, so salary isn't the only factor in lifetime income. Benefits do have monetary value to employees. Employers don't usually give benefit - money directly to employees in most cases.

Answer:

He is incorrect because health insurance will save the employee money he could apply to retirement.