question 18\nwhen an environmental group accused a local energy company of illegally dumping waste in a…

question 18\nwhen an environmental group accused a local energy company of illegally dumping waste in a river, the company spokesperson released a statement denying the allegations and insisting that the energy company complied with current environmental law.\nwhich social responsibility stance did the energy company take?\naccommodative\ndefensive\nobstructionist\nproactive

question 18\nwhen an environmental group accused a local energy company of illegally dumping waste in a river, the company spokesperson released a statement denying the allegations and insisting that the energy company complied with current environmental law.\nwhich social responsibility stance did the energy company take?\naccommodative\ndefensive\nobstructionist\nproactive

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The company is denying the allegations and defending its actions, which is characteristic of a defensive stance in corporate social - responsibility. An accommodative stance would involve accepting and addressing the claims, an obstructionist stance would involve more aggressive and uncooperative behavior, and a proactive stance would mean going beyond compliance and taking extra steps to be socially responsible even before being accused.

Answer:

B. Defensive