read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: federal regulation needs to be reexamined because of the…

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: federal regulation needs to be reexamined because of the way the burden of compliance affects small businesses. evidence: one estimate found that compliance to federal regulations costs small businesses as much as $3,000 more per employee than large businesses. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. if regulatory inefficiencies arent fixed, it will be impossible for american small businesses to compete in foreign markets. its not fair for regulatory requirements to disproportionately affect small businesses.

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: federal regulation needs to be reexamined because of the way the burden of compliance affects small businesses. evidence: one estimate found that compliance to federal regulations costs small businesses as much as $3,000 more per employee than large businesses. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. if regulatory inefficiencies arent fixed, it will be impossible for american small businesses to compete in foreign markets. its not fair for regulatory requirements to disproportionately affect small businesses.

Answer

Answer: It's not fair for regulatory requirements to disproportionately affect small businesses.

Brief Explanations: The evidence shows higher per - employee compliance costs for small businesses. This analysis directly relates to the unfairness of regulations affecting small businesses, which supports the claim about re - examining federal regulation.