which best explains the difference between a ball - and - stick model of a chemical compound and a space…

which best explains the difference between a ball - and - stick model of a chemical compound and a space - filling model? ball - and - stick models can show compounds in three dimensions, but space - filling models cannot. space - filling models can show compounds in three dimensions, but ball - and - stick models cannot. ball - and - stick models show the bonds between atoms, but not the relative sizes of atoms. space - filling models show the relative sizes of atoms, but not the bonds between atoms. space - filling models show the bonds between atoms, but not the relative sizes of atoms. ball - and - stick models show the relative sizes of atoms, but not the bonds between atoms.

which best explains the difference between a ball - and - stick model of a chemical compound and a space - filling model? ball - and - stick models can show compounds in three dimensions, but space - filling models cannot. space - filling models can show compounds in three dimensions, but ball - and - stick models cannot. ball - and - stick models show the bonds between atoms, but not the relative sizes of atoms. space - filling models show the relative sizes of atoms, but not the bonds between atoms. space - filling models show the bonds between atoms, but not the relative sizes of atoms. ball - and - stick models show the relative sizes of atoms, but not the bonds between atoms.

Answer

Answer:

Space - filling models show the relative sizes of atoms, but not the bonds between atoms. Ball - and - stick models show the bonds between atoms, but not the relative sizes of atoms.

Brief Explanations:

In ball - and - stick models, balls represent atoms and sticks represent bonds. Space - filling models emphasize atomic sizes by filling space proportionally to atom size, with less focus on bonds.