henry mixed salt and water together in a cup until he observed a clear solution. he measured the mass of the…

henry mixed salt and water together in a cup until he observed a clear solution. he measured the mass of the solution. then he placed the cup outside for several sunny days during the summer. after a week, he observed that only solid salt remained in the cup and the mass had decreased. henry concluded that a physical and chemical change occurred in this investigation. which statements correctly defend or dispute his conclusion? he is correct. dissolving salt in water is a physical change, but evaporating the water is a chemical change. formation of a solid is evidence that a chemical change occurred. he is correct. evaporation is a physical change, but dissolving salt in water is a chemical change. the change in mass is evidence that a chemical change occurred. he is incorrect. dissolving salt in water and evaporation of the water are both physical changes. the reappearance of salt is evidence that the change was reversible by a physical change, so it could not be a chemical change. he is incorrect. dissolving salt in water and evaporation of the water are both chemical
Answer
Brief Explanations:
La disolución de sal en agua es un cambio físico porque no se forma un nuevo compuesto químico, solo la sal se disuelve en el agua. La evaporación del agua también es un cambio físico, ya que solo cambia el estado físico del agua de líquido a gas. La reapariencia de la sal es evidencia de que el cambio fue reversible a través de un cambio físico, no un cambio químico.
Answer:
He is incorrect. Dissolving salt in water and evaporation of the water are both physical changes. The reappearance of salt is evidence that the change was reversible by a physical change, so it could not be a chemical change.