buildings have a large carbon footprint\nbuildings are responsible for 40 percent of our\ncarbon footprint…

buildings have a large carbon footprint\nbuildings are responsible for 40 percent of our\ncarbon footprint. building materials must be\nharvested and processed. these activities\nrelease carbon dioxide. even more carbon\ndioxide is released during the construction\nprocess. still more is released to keep\nbuildings heated and cooled.\n\nto devise ways to lower the carbon footprint\nof buildings, scientists and architects are\ncollaborating. one architect, rachel\narmstrong, has been leading a team of\nscientists in exploring a technique called\n\living architecture.\ the term \living\narchitecture\ refers to using biological\nelements to change the way our buildings\naffect the environment. living architecture is\n\nwhich statement best explains how the author\nstructures the passage in order to develop an\nargument in favor of living architecture?\n\nthe author describes the large carbon footprint\nproblem caused by buildings and then proposes a\nsolution.\n\nthe author presents several expert opinions on\nprotocell technology and then takes a position.\n\nthe author introduces a new invention related to\nprotocells and then considers its flaws.\n\nthe author raises a question about our carbon\nfootprint and then considers several possible\nanswers.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
The first paragraph of the passage focuses on the large carbon footprint of buildings, highlighting the carbon dioxide released during material harvesting, processing, construction, and heating/cooling. The second paragraph then introduces the concept of "living architecture" as a solution to lower the carbon footprint. This structure of presenting a problem (large carbon footprint of buildings) and then proposing a solution (living architecture) is a common way to develop an argument.
Answer:
The author describes the large carbon footprint problem caused by buildings and then proposes a solution.