compare the details that were included in bot...
compare the details that were included in both texts.\ndetail text 1 text 2\nlackss cells were unique because they flourished in the laboratory. ✓ ✓\nsome of lackss cells were removed by her doctors for research. ✓ ✓\neven today, scientists are using lackss cells for research projects. ✓\nlackss cells have made many advances in medical research possible. ✓ ✓\njohns hopkins staff never informed lacks or her family that they had taken the cells from her. ✓\nwho would likely agree that the medical breakthroughs made with hela cells do not excuse researchers failure to inform lackss family about them?\nthe author of text 1\nthe author of text 2\nboth authors
Answer
# Brief Explanations:
The table shows that the detail about Johns Hopkins staff not informing Lacks or her family is present in Text 1. Since there is no indication that Text 2 has a different stance on this moral - ethical aspect related to the lack of communication while highlighting the medical significance of the cells, and considering the common ethical concerns around informed consent, it is likely that both authors would agree that medical breakthroughs do not excuse the lack of communication.
# Answer:
both authors