which was most likely an effect on society that resulted from improvements in blood handling during world…

which was most likely an effect on society that resulted from improvements in blood handling during world war i and world war ii?\nmore soldiers died as a result of incorrect blood typing.\nmore soldiers who had lost a limb returned home.\nmore donations were needed as a result of poor storage techniques.\nmore organizations spoke out against the war.

which was most likely an effect on society that resulted from improvements in blood handling during world war i and world war ii?\nmore soldiers died as a result of incorrect blood typing.\nmore soldiers who had lost a limb returned home.\nmore donations were needed as a result of poor storage techniques.\nmore organizations spoke out against the war.

Answer

Answer:

More soldiers who had lost a limb returned home.

Brief Explanations:

Improved blood - handling meant better medical care for injured soldiers, increasing their survival rate and ability to recover, like those who lost limbs being able to return home. Incorrect blood typing would be less likely with improvements. Better blood - handling implies better storage, reducing the need for more donations. There is no direct link between blood - handling improvements and organizations speaking out against war.