there was a raging storm. it was in the forest. rain fell. leaves rustled as the wind swept through the…

there was a raging storm. it was in the forest. rain fell. leaves rustled as the wind swept through the trees. squirrels hid as the sky opened up. all the birds, nestled in the trees, quieted and stopped chirping. which revision best uses a phrase to combine the first two sentences? there was a raging forest storm. deep in the forest, a storm was raging. to escape the storm, forest animals hid. to the animals of the forest, a storm raged.

there was a raging storm. it was in the forest. rain fell. leaves rustled as the wind swept through the trees. squirrels hid as the sky opened up. all the birds, nestled in the trees, quieted and stopped chirping. which revision best uses a phrase to combine the first two sentences? there was a raging forest storm. deep in the forest, a storm was raging. to escape the storm, forest animals hid. to the animals of the forest, a storm raged.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The first - two sentences "There was a raging storm. It was in the forest." can be combined using the phrase "in the forest" to create a more concise sentence. "Deep in the forest, a storm was raging." uses a prepositional phrase "Deep in the forest" to combine the information about the location and the storm. The other options do not combine the first two sentences as effectively.

Answer:

Deep in the forest, a storm was raging.