read the sentence.\nthe lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury it was unbelievable how influenced…

read the sentence.\nthe lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case in the hopes of winning the trial.\nwhich is the best revision of the sentence?\nthe lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury (it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case) in hope of winning the trial.\nthe lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury—it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case—in hope of winning the trial.\nthe lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury, it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case, in hope of winning the trial.\nno change

read the sentence.\nthe lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case in the hopes of winning the trial.\nwhich is the best revision of the sentence?\nthe lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury (it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case) in hope of winning the trial.\nthe lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury—it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case—in hope of winning the trial.\nthe lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury, it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case, in hope of winning the trial.\nno change

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The original sentence is a run - on. Using em dashes to set off the non - essential clause "it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case" makes the sentence more grammatically correct and the meaning clearer. Parentheses can also be used for non - essential information, but em dashes are a more common and stylistically appropriate choice here. Commas alone do not properly separate the clauses in the third option, making it still a run - on.

Answer:

The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury—it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case—in hope of winning the trial.