this shows a headline from the new york times about genocide. massacre by turks in caucasus towns armenians…

this shows a headline from the new york times about genocide. massacre by turks in caucasus towns armenians led out into the streets and shot or drowned ---old friends not spared. what conclusion can be drawn based on the headline? the international community was aware of what was going on but was unable to stop it. there was disillusionment because this massacre occurred following the holocaust. armenians were targeted because they were muslim and the turks were christians. in this case, the government was not supportive of the actions of the perpetrators.

this shows a headline from the new york times about genocide. massacre by turks in caucasus towns armenians led out into the streets and shot or drowned ---old friends not spared. what conclusion can be drawn based on the headline? the international community was aware of what was going on but was unable to stop it. there was disillusionment because this massacre occurred following the holocaust. armenians were targeted because they were muslim and the turks were christians. in this case, the government was not supportive of the actions of the perpetrators.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The headline indicates a massacre by Turks in Caucasus towns where Armenians were led out and killed. The international - community being aware but unable to stop it is a reasonable conclusion as such large - scale violence would likely be known internationally. The other options have inaccuracies: the massacre predates the Holocaust; Armenians are Christian and Turks are mainly Muslim; and the headline implies state - sponsored violence rather than the government not supporting the perpetrators.

Answer:

The international community was aware of what was going on but was unable to stop it.