which statement best shows how evidence related to historical events can support a claim?\nsecondary sources…

which statement best shows how evidence related to historical events can support a claim?\nsecondary sources can include song lyrics written by people to communicate their experiences.\nartifacts can summarize a large amount of information about a past time period.\nprimary sources can include the exact words that witnesses used to testify at a trial.\nstatistics can allow readers to focus on emotions rather than details about a past occurrence.

which statement best shows how evidence related to historical events can support a claim?\nsecondary sources can include song lyrics written by people to communicate their experiences.\nartifacts can summarize a large amount of information about a past time period.\nprimary sources can include the exact words that witnesses used to testify at a trial.\nstatistics can allow readers to focus on emotions rather than details about a past occurrence.

Answer

Answer:

C. Primary sources can include the exact words that witnesses used to testify at a trial.

Brief Explanation:

Primary sources are direct evidence of historical events. Witness - testimony at a trial is a primary source that can support a claim about an event, as it comes directly from those who were present. Secondary sources like song - lyrics are interpretations. Artifacts are physical remains but don't always summarize large amounts of info. Statistics are not about emotions but about numerical data related to events.