how could you correctly combine the first three sentences of the passage below to add variety? check all…

how could you correctly combine the first three sentences of the passage below to add variety? check all that apply. i saw amir. i was visiting new york. he lives there. we went to an italian restaurant and ate big plates of spaghetti. it was a fun outing. i saw amir, who lives in new york, when i was visiting. when i was visiting new york, i saw amir, who lives there. when i was visiting new york; i saw amir, who lives there. i saw amir when i was visiting new york, which is where he lives. i saw amir, when i was visiting new york, that is where he lives.

how could you correctly combine the first three sentences of the passage below to add variety? check all that apply. i saw amir. i was visiting new york. he lives there. we went to an italian restaurant and ate big plates of spaghetti. it was a fun outing. i saw amir, who lives in new york, when i was visiting. when i was visiting new york, i saw amir, who lives there. when i was visiting new york; i saw amir, who lives there. i saw amir when i was visiting new york, which is where he lives. i saw amir, when i was visiting new york, that is where he lives.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  • Analizamos la gramática y la coherencia de cada opción.
  • La primera opción es correcta ya que utiliza una cláusula relativa adecuadamente.
  • La segunda opción es correcta, presentando la secuencia temporal adecuada.
  • La tercera opción tiene un error de puntuación (punto y coma en lugar de coma).
  • La cuarta opción es redundante al repetir "I saw Amir" dos veces.
  • La quinta opción es correcta, usando "which" para introducir información adicional.
  • La sexta opción tiene un error gramatical al usar "that" en lugar de "which" en una cláusula no - restrictiva.

Answer:

A. I saw Amir, who lives in New York, when I was visiting. B. When I was visiting New York, I saw Amir, who lives there. E. I saw Amir when I was visiting New York, which is where he lives.