the 25th anniversary of the clean water act by vice president al gore\nin this 1997 speech, vice president…

the 25th anniversary of the clean water act by vice president al gore\nin this 1997 speech, vice president al gore reflects on the legacy of the clean water act. the act, passed in 1972, aimed to reduce the effects of pollution on the nations waterways, as well as providing assistance to states to carry out that goal. but the act was also important for raising awareness for many americans of the consequences of water pollution.\n(1) we remember a time when the potomac river was choked with algae. when lake erie was dying. when too many coastal waters were degraded. when too many urban rivers and beaches were open sewers. when too many communities didnt have clean, safe water they could depend on.\n(2) twenty - five years ago today, america had a change of heart - and a change of course. instead of polluting our waters, we decided to clean them. since the passage of the clean water act, we have stopped billions of pounds of pollution from flowing into our rivers, lakes, and streams, and doubled the number of waters safe for swimming and fishing.\n(3) this change of heart was formalized by our laws, but it was carried out by our people. people like vicki deisner of the ohio environmental council. vicki grew up in the cleveland area and remembers the cuyahoga river catching fire. for most of her adult life she has worked to clean up and restore the cuyahoga and other rivers and, as a health professional, she has worked with young children affected by toxic pollution. now shes working on a pollution prevention project with businesses located along three ohio rivers - finding cost - effective ways to prevent pollution, and sharing them with smaller businesses.\n(4) because of people like vicki, the cuyahoga river has been revitalized, the harbor where it meets lake erie is alive with boaters and tourists, and lake erie itself is now home to a $600 million fishing industry.\n(5) but problems persist. for all our success, there are still dangerous run - offs of toxins and pollutants into our streams, communities that dont have the knowledge or the resources to fully protect their water, regions where the wrong kind of development threatens our hard - won progress.\n(6) first, we must do more to protect the public health. people shouldnt have to worry about whether the water they drink is safe, or whether the fish in our waters can be served in our children.\nselect the correct answer from the drop - down menu.\nread the excerpt from paragraphs 10 and 11.\nour joint action on this issue - as much as any other - will test the moral character of our country. an old scriptural passage asks: \who among you, if your children ask bread, will you give them a stone, or if they ask a fish, will you give them a serpent?\\nwe might also ask: who among you, if your children ask for fish, will you give them a contaminated fish, if your children ask for water, will you give them unclean water? you see, protecting our water is one of the deepest obligations we have - to ourselves, to our children, and to our future.\nwhat point of view does gore convey in this excerpt?\ngore believes that clean water is a more pressing concern than clear air for most people; effective environmental policy requires strong leadership above all; people should be encouraged to share food and water with one another; people have an important ethical responsibility to keep water clean

the 25th anniversary of the clean water act by vice president al gore\nin this 1997 speech, vice president al gore reflects on the legacy of the clean water act. the act, passed in 1972, aimed to reduce the effects of pollution on the nations waterways, as well as providing assistance to states to carry out that goal. but the act was also important for raising awareness for many americans of the consequences of water pollution.\n(1) we remember a time when the potomac river was choked with algae. when lake erie was dying. when too many coastal waters were degraded. when too many urban rivers and beaches were open sewers. when too many communities didnt have clean, safe water they could depend on.\n(2) twenty - five years ago today, america had a change of heart - and a change of course. instead of polluting our waters, we decided to clean them. since the passage of the clean water act, we have stopped billions of pounds of pollution from flowing into our rivers, lakes, and streams, and doubled the number of waters safe for swimming and fishing.\n(3) this change of heart was formalized by our laws, but it was carried out by our people. people like vicki deisner of the ohio environmental council. vicki grew up in the cleveland area and remembers the cuyahoga river catching fire. for most of her adult life she has worked to clean up and restore the cuyahoga and other rivers and, as a health professional, she has worked with young children affected by toxic pollution. now shes working on a pollution prevention project with businesses located along three ohio rivers - finding cost - effective ways to prevent pollution, and sharing them with smaller businesses.\n(4) because of people like vicki, the cuyahoga river has been revitalized, the harbor where it meets lake erie is alive with boaters and tourists, and lake erie itself is now home to a $600 million fishing industry.\n(5) but problems persist. for all our success, there are still dangerous run - offs of toxins and pollutants into our streams, communities that dont have the knowledge or the resources to fully protect their water, regions where the wrong kind of development threatens our hard - won progress.\n(6) first, we must do more to protect the public health. people shouldnt have to worry about whether the water they drink is safe, or whether the fish in our waters can be served in our children.\nselect the correct answer from the drop - down menu.\nread the excerpt from paragraphs 10 and 11.\nour joint action on this issue - as much as any other - will test the moral character of our country. an old scriptural passage asks: \who among you, if your children ask bread, will you give them a stone, or if they ask a fish, will you give them a serpent?\\nwe might also ask: who among you, if your children ask for fish, will you give them a contaminated fish, if your children ask for water, will you give them unclean water? you see, protecting our water is one of the deepest obligations we have - to ourselves, to our children, and to our future.\nwhat point of view does gore convey in this excerpt?\ngore believes that clean water is a more pressing concern than clear air for most people; effective environmental policy requires strong leadership above all; people should be encouraged to share food and water with one another; people have an important ethical responsibility to keep water clean

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The excerpt uses a moral - scriptural reference and emphasizes that protecting water is an obligation to ourselves, children, and the future. This indicates an ethical responsibility to keep water clean.

Answer:

people have an important ethical responsibility to keep water clean