check your understanding\nwhy is this argument considered invalid?\npremise 1 = all dogs are…

check your understanding\nwhy is this argument considered invalid?\npremise 1 = all dogs are animals.\npremise 2 = all german shepherds are animals.\nconclusion = all dogs are german shepherds.\na) premise 1 is incorrect – all dogs aren’t animals.\nb) the conclusion does not follow logic since there are many other breeds of world.\nc) premise 2 is incorrect – all german shepherds aren’t dogs.\nd) this is a valid argument.

check your understanding\nwhy is this argument considered invalid?\npremise 1 = all dogs are animals.\npremise 2 = all german shepherds are animals.\nconclusion = all dogs are german shepherds.\na) premise 1 is incorrect – all dogs aren’t animals.\nb) the conclusion does not follow logic since there are many other breeds of world.\nc) premise 2 is incorrect – all german shepherds aren’t dogs.\nd) this is a valid argument.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Premise 1 and 2 are correct as dogs and German Shepherds are animals. But the conclusion is wrong because there are many dog - breeds other than German Shepherds, so it doesn't follow logically from the premises.

Answer:

B. The conclusion does not follow logic since there are many other breeds of dogs in the world.