claim: although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the…

claim: although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefits it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made.\nreason #1: animal research has yielded both pain - relieving and life - saving drugs for humans.\nreason #2: laws prohibit scientists from using animal - based research in cases where non - animal testing would produce equally clear and valid results.\nanimal research is extremely costly, so it is in the best financial interest of scientists to pursue other means of testing before deciding to utilize animals in their research.\nwith just 115 inspectors and over 7,500 facilities involved with the research, breeding, or handling of animals in some way, regulation of the animal welfare act is virtually impossible.\nenacted in 1966, the animal welfare act is a us federal law that regulates the care and use of animals in a variety of circumstances, including medical research and testing.\npeople will not tolerate the suffering of animals, so it is only logical that scientists will only use animal testing as a last resort when all other measures have failed.

claim: although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefits it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made.\nreason #1: animal research has yielded both pain - relieving and life - saving drugs for humans.\nreason #2: laws prohibit scientists from using animal - based research in cases where non - animal testing would produce equally clear and valid results.\nanimal research is extremely costly, so it is in the best financial interest of scientists to pursue other means of testing before deciding to utilize animals in their research.\nwith just 115 inspectors and over 7,500 facilities involved with the research, breeding, or handling of animals in some way, regulation of the animal welfare act is virtually impossible.\nenacted in 1966, the animal welfare act is a us federal law that regulates the care and use of animals in a variety of circumstances, including medical research and testing.\npeople will not tolerate the suffering of animals, so it is only logical that scientists will only use animal testing as a last resort when all other measures have failed.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The claim is about the benefits of animal - based medical testing outweighing rights concerns. Reasons given are medical benefits and legal restrictions on using animal - based research when alternatives exist. We need to find a statement that supports the claim. The first option focuses on cost, the second on regulation difficulties, the third is just a statement about a law, and the fourth supports the idea that animals are used as a last resort which implies benefits justify use.

Answer:

People will not tolerate the suffering of animals, so it is only logical that scientists will only use animal testing as a last resort when all other measures have failed.