what is the conclusion of the following argument? premise 1: the person with the lowest handicap is the best…

what is the conclusion of the following argument? premise 1: the person with the lowest handicap is the best bowler on the team. premise 2: charlie has the lowest handicap on the team. conclusion: charlie is the best bowler on the team. invalid and unsound invalid valid and unsound sound and valid

what is the conclusion of the following argument? premise 1: the person with the lowest handicap is the best bowler on the team. premise 2: charlie has the lowest handicap on the team. conclusion: charlie is the best bowler on the team. invalid and unsound invalid valid and unsound sound and valid

Answer

Answer:

D. Sound and valid

Brief Explanations:

The argument is valid as the conclusion follows logically from the premises. It is sound because if we assume the premises are true (the person with the lowest - handicap is the best bowler and Charlie has the lowest handicap), the conclusion that Charlie is the best bowler is both validly derived and based on true - like assumptions in the context of the argument.