determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. some animals are not black and white. this…

determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. some animals are not black and white. this horse is not black and white. therefore, this horse is an animal. valid argument invalid argument i never have cream and sugar in my coffee. i am drinking coffee. therefore, there arent cream and sugar in my coffee. valid argument invalid argument question help: message instructor post to forum

determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. some animals are not black and white. this horse is not black and white. therefore, this horse is an animal. valid argument invalid argument i never have cream and sugar in my coffee. i am drinking coffee. therefore, there arent cream and sugar in my coffee. valid argument invalid argument question help: message instructor post to forum

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  1. For the first argument about the horse: Just because some animals are not black - and - white and the horse is not black - and - white, it doesn't necessarily mean the horse is an animal. The non - black - and - white property is not enough to conclude the horse's membership in the animal category. There could be non - animal things that are not black and white too.
  2. For the second argument about coffee: If a person never has cream and sugar in their coffee and they are currently drinking coffee, it logically follows that there isn't cream and sugar in their coffee based on their stated habit.

Answer:

  1. Invalid argument
  2. Valid argument