determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. some animals are not black and white. this…

determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. some animals are not black and white. this horse is not black and white. therefore, this horse is an animal. valid argument invalid argument every song written by paul mccartney is a hit song. this song was written by paul mccartney. therefore, this song is a hit song. valid argument invalid argument question help: video message instructor calculator

determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. some animals are not black and white. this horse is not black and white. therefore, this horse is an animal. valid argument invalid argument every song written by paul mccartney is a hit song. this song was written by paul mccartney. therefore, this song is a hit song. valid argument invalid argument question help: video message instructor calculator

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  1. For the first argument, just because some animals are not black - and - white and a horse is not black - and - white, it doesn't necessarily mean the horse is an animal. The non - black - and - white characteristic doesn't establish the horse as an animal. It's an invalid form of reasoning.
  2. For the second argument, if every song written by Paul McCartney is a hit song and this song was written by Paul McCartney, then by the principle of deductive reasoning (modus ponens), this song must be a hit song. It is a valid argument.

Answer:

  1. Invalid argument
  2. Valid argument