determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. all children are energetic. some actors are…

determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. all children are energetic. some actors are children. therefore, some actors are energetic. valid argument invalid argument all flowers need water. roses need water. therefore, roses are flowers. valid argument invalid argument question help: video message instructor calculator

determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. all children are energetic. some actors are children. therefore, some actors are energetic. valid argument invalid argument all flowers need water. roses need water. therefore, roses are flowers. valid argument invalid argument question help: video message instructor calculator

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  1. For the first argument: Since all children are energetic and some actors are children, by the law of syllogism in logic, we can conclude that some actors are energetic. So it is a valid argument.
  2. For the second argument: Just because all flowers need water and roses need water, we cannot logically conclude that roses are flowers. This is an example of the fallacy of affirming the consequent. So it is an invalid argument.

Answer:

  1. Valid argument
  2. Invalid argument