how might it be evaluated by a utilitarian?\na.) hacking david’s internet is morally wrong because he might…

how might it be evaluated by a utilitarian?\na.) hacking david’s internet is morally wrong because he might discover what’s happening and change the password, making it difficult to keep doing.\nb.) hacking david’s internet is morally wrong because it is a type of stealing, and stealing something someone else paid for is always wrong.\nc.) hacking david’s internet is morally right because, as a wealthier member of the community, he owes it to less fortunate community members.\nd.) hacking david’s internet is morally right because it brings about happiness for his neighbors, who can’t

how might it be evaluated by a utilitarian?\na.) hacking david’s internet is morally wrong because he might discover what’s happening and change the password, making it difficult to keep doing.\nb.) hacking david’s internet is morally wrong because it is a type of stealing, and stealing something someone else paid for is always wrong.\nc.) hacking david’s internet is morally right because, as a wealthier member of the community, he owes it to less fortunate community members.\nd.) hacking david’s internet is morally right because it brings about happiness for his neighbors, who can’t

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Utilitarianism evaluates actions based on their consequences, specifically the overall happiness or utility they produce. Option d states that hacking David’s internet is morally right because it brings about happiness for his neighbors (who can’t afford it, presumably). This aligns with utilitarianism’s focus on maximizing happiness. Option a focuses on practical difficulties, not utility. Option b is about stealing (a deontological view, focusing on rules). Option c is about obligation based on wealth, not utility.

Answer:

d.) Hacking David’s internet is morally right because it brings about happiness for his neighbors, who can’t (afford it, implied).