in her speech on chewing tobacco, catherine made the following argument: to be effective, laws governing…

in her speech on chewing tobacco, catherine made the following argument: to be effective, laws governing chewing tobacco sales to minors must be enforced and must have adequate penalties for people who violate the law. my proposal will significantly increase both enforcement provisions and penalties for violators. therefore, my plan will be effective. what kind of reasoning did catherine use? multiple choice reasoning from analogy reasoning from need reasoning from principle reasoning from specific instances

in her speech on chewing tobacco, catherine made the following argument: to be effective, laws governing chewing tobacco sales to minors must be enforced and must have adequate penalties for people who violate the law. my proposal will significantly increase both enforcement provisions and penalties for violators. therefore, my plan will be effective. what kind of reasoning did catherine use? multiple choice reasoning from analogy reasoning from need reasoning from principle reasoning from specific instances

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Catherine starts with a general principle that effective laws on chewing - tobacco sales to minors need enforcement and adequate penalties. Then she shows how her proposal adheres to this principle to conclude it will be effective. This is reasoning from principle.

Answer:

C. reasoning from principle