what might an opposing view be for the following claim? claim: animals should not be used to test human…
what might an opposing view be for the following claim? claim: animals should not be used to test human products. experimenting with animals is justified if it helps improve human life. many animals are used to test human - grade product safety. mice and rats are common animals used for testing. many people believe testing on animals violates their rights.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
The claim is that animals should not be used for human - product testing. An opposing view would support animal testing. The option "Experimenting with animals is justified if it helps improve human life" supports animal testing as it provides a reason for why it can be acceptable, which is in contrast to the original claim. The other options either state facts about animal testing or support the original claim.
Answer:
Experimenting with animals is justified if it helps improve human life.