what is the outcome of the following argument? premise 1: boys love to eat cereals. premise 2: jayden loves…

what is the outcome of the following argument? premise 1: boys love to eat cereals. premise 2: jayden loves to eat cereals. conclusion: jayden is a boy. valid and sound invalid invalid and sound valid and unsound

what is the outcome of the following argument? premise 1: boys love to eat cereals. premise 2: jayden loves to eat cereals. conclusion: jayden is a boy. valid and sound invalid invalid and sound valid and unsound

Answer

Answer:

Invalid

Brief Explanations:

The argument has a logical fallacy. Just because boys love to eat cereals and Jayden loves to eat cereals doesn't necessarily mean Jayden is a boy. The first - premise doesn't exclude non - boys from loving cereals. So the conclusion doesn't follow logically from the premises, making the argument invalid.