question 19\nbelow is the “wrongness of killing” argument as applied to the baby theresa story. how would we…

question 19\nbelow is the “wrongness of killing” argument as applied to the baby theresa story. how would we go about evaluating the truth - condition of p2?\np1: it is wrong to kill one person to save another.\np2: taking theresas organs would be killing her to save others.\n∴ therefore, it is wrong to take baby theresas organs.\np2 is a medically uncertain, so we would evaluate its truth according to whether it was medically verified.\np2 is a moral principle so we would evaluate its truth according to whether it was an acceptable moral principle.\np2 is attempting to make a fact - stating claim, so we would evaluate it according to whether it is, in fact, true.\nall answers are correct.\np2 is the conclusion of the moral argument and so we would evaluate it according to the logic condition of the argument.

question 19\nbelow is the “wrongness of killing” argument as applied to the baby theresa story. how would we go about evaluating the truth - condition of p2?\np1: it is wrong to kill one person to save another.\np2: taking theresas organs would be killing her to save others.\n∴ therefore, it is wrong to take baby theresas organs.\np2 is a medically uncertain, so we would evaluate its truth according to whether it was medically verified.\np2 is a moral principle so we would evaluate its truth according to whether it was an acceptable moral principle.\np2 is attempting to make a fact - stating claim, so we would evaluate it according to whether it is, in fact, true.\nall answers are correct.\np2 is the conclusion of the moral argument and so we would evaluate it according to the logic condition of the argument.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

P2 is a factual - stating claim about the nature of taking Baby Theresa's organs. To evaluate its truth - condition, we need to determine if it is factually true that taking her organs would be killing her to save others. It is not a medical uncertainty in the context of the argument's structure, nor is it a moral principle itself (P1 is the moral principle). Also, P2 is a premise, not the conclusion.

Answer:

P2 is attempting to make a fact - stating claim, so we would evaluate it according to whether it is, in fact, true.