a scientific argument will be considered invalid if the evidence supporting that argument is based…

a scientific argument will be considered invalid if the evidence supporting that argument is based on\ninconsistent data.\nindependent data.\nunlimited results.\ncontrolled results.

a scientific argument will be considered invalid if the evidence supporting that argument is based on\ninconsistent data.\nindependent data.\nunlimited results.\ncontrolled results.

Answer

Answer:

A. inconsistent data

Brief Explanation:

Scientific arguments need reliable data. Inconsistent data can't support a valid argument as it lacks reliability and repeatability. Independent data can be valid, unlimited results aren't inherently invalid - they might just need more analysis, and controlled results are often reliable for valid arguments.