score: 0/9 answered: 0/9 question 1 determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. some…

score: 0/9 answered: 0/9 question 1 determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. some frogs have feathers. my parrot has feathers. therefore, my parrot is not a frog. valid argument invalid argument all frogs have feathers. my parrot has feathers. therefore, my parrot is a frog. valid argument invalid argument question help: message instructor post to forum

score: 0/9 answered: 0/9 question 1 determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. some frogs have feathers. my parrot has feathers. therefore, my parrot is not a frog. valid argument invalid argument all frogs have feathers. my parrot has feathers. therefore, my parrot is a frog. valid argument invalid argument question help: message instructor post to forum

Answer

Brief Explanations:

For the first argument, just because some frogs have feathers and the parrot has feathers, we can't be sure the parrot is not a frog. There is an overlap in the "feathered" - group but not enough information to rule out the parrot being a frog. For the second argument, just because all frogs have feathers and the parrot has feathers, we can't conclude the parrot is a frog. Having feathers is a necessary but not sufficient condition to be a frog. In both cases, the conclusions do not follow logically from the premises.

Answer:

Invalid argument Invalid argument