what section would the following information go in the lincoln - douglas debate?\nclash #1: since many…

what section would the following information go in the lincoln - douglas debate?\nclash #1: since many animals commonly tested on can feel pain on similar levels to humans, it follows that they have the same right to not be tortured that humans do.\nclash #2: while animal testing for the benefit of humans could accidentally save animal lives, our resolution does not ban animal testing for the benefit of animals. undoubtedly, animal research is necessary to treat diseases in animals. to evaluate the ethics of animal research when it provides mutual benefit to animals goes beyond the scope of the debate. even if millions of animals have been saved from treatments developed during research intended for humans, the poor documentation outlined by the status quo makes it difficult to evaluate the extent to which animals have benefited.\no a. definition of terms\no b. rebuttal\no c. context / background / status quo
Answer
Brief Explanations:
The text presents counter - arguments to positions on animal testing, which is characteristic of a rebuttal in a debate. It addresses opposing views and tries to undermine them.
Answer:
B. Rebuttal