sidewalks that are the property of the municipality\ndo not have to be inspected\nare typically asphalt\nare…

sidewalks that are the property of the municipality\ndo not have to be inspected\nare typically asphalt\nare usually in worse condition than other walkways\nmust be at least five feet wide\ncannot be made with pavers\nquestion 40\ndownspouts running across roof surfaces\nmay damage the roof\ncan cause ice damming problems\nprotect the roof from roof or gutter discharge from a higher roof\nare prone to clogging because they are not vertical\nshould be avoided because the concentrated amount of water will overflow the gutter below

sidewalks that are the property of the municipality\ndo not have to be inspected\nare typically asphalt\nare usually in worse condition than other walkways\nmust be at least five feet wide\ncannot be made with pavers\nquestion 40\ndownspouts running across roof surfaces\nmay damage the roof\ncan cause ice damming problems\nprotect the roof from roof or gutter discharge from a higher roof\nare prone to clogging because they are not vertical\nshould be avoided because the concentrated amount of water will overflow the gutter below

Answer

Answer:

(1) None of the above options are clearly correct based on common - knowledge without further context. But if we assume typical practices, sidewalks that are municipality - owned are typically inspected, they can be made of various materials including asphalt, their condition can vary compared to other walkways, there is no universal requirement for a 5 - foot width, and they can be made with pavers. So, no single option is definitively true. (2) B. can cause ice damming problems