tell whether this argument is a valid or invalid deduction. all fish have gills, and all sharks are fish…

tell whether this argument is a valid or invalid deduction. all fish have gills, and all sharks are fish. therefore, all sharks have gills. after you pick your answer press go. valid invalid
Answer
Brief Explanations:
This is a classic example of syllogistic reasoning. The first - premise states a general property of all fish (having gills). The second - premise states that sharks belong to the category of fish. By the law of syllogism, if all members of a set (fish) have a certain property (gills) and another set (sharks) is a subset of the first set, then all members of the subset (sharks) must have that property.
Answer:
Valid