tell whether this argument is a valid or invalid deduction. pam wears goofy outfits. all mascots for…

tell whether this argument is a valid or invalid deduction. pam wears goofy outfits. all mascots for professional sports teams wear goofy outfits, so pam must be a mascot for a professional sports team. after you pick your answer press go. valid invalid

tell whether this argument is a valid or invalid deduction. pam wears goofy outfits. all mascots for professional sports teams wear goofy outfits, so pam must be a mascot for a professional sports team. after you pick your answer press go. valid invalid

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Just because Pam wears goofy - outfits and all mascots for professional sports teams wear goofy outfits, it doesn't mean Pam is a mascot. There could be others who wear goofy outfits that are not mascots. This is an example of the fallacy of affirming the consequent in logical reasoning.

Answer:

Invalid