a writer is studying recycling practices, and she finds an article written by an organization that is pro…

a writer is studying recycling practices, and she finds an article written by an organization that is pro - recycling. the article presents only one perspective on this issue. when is it acceptable for the writer to use a source like this? the writer can use this source as long as she explains the sources stance and includes other perspectives. the writer can never use this source because it doesnt present multiple perspectives. the writer can use this source by itself as long as it reinforces her own perspective.

a writer is studying recycling practices, and she finds an article written by an organization that is pro - recycling. the article presents only one perspective on this issue. when is it acceptable for the writer to use a source like this? the writer can use this source as long as she explains the sources stance and includes other perspectives. the writer can never use this source because it doesnt present multiple perspectives. the writer can use this source by itself as long as it reinforces her own perspective.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

When using a source with a single - perspective (pro - recycling in this case), it is important for academic integrity. If the writer explains the source's stance (its pro - recycling bias) and includes other perspectives, it shows that the writer is aware of the source's limitations and is presenting a more comprehensive view. Using a source just because it reinforces one's own perspective is not good academic practice as it can lead to confirmation bias. And saying a source can never be used just because it has a single perspective is too extreme; with proper handling (explaining the stance and adding other views), it can be used.

Answer:

The writer can use this source as long as she explains the source's stance and includes other perspectives.