according to a pilot study of 20 people condu...

according to a pilot study of 20 people conducted at the university of minnesota, daily doses of a compound called arabinogalactan over a period of 6 months resulted in a significant increase in the beneficial lactobacillus species of bacteria. should it be concluded that the compound is beneficial for the majority of people? why or why not? the best choice is yes, it should be concluded that the compound is beneficial for the majority of people. the sample size is 20, which is an adequate sample for representing the majority of people. yes, it should be concluded that the compound is beneficial for the majority of people. we have no reason to question whether or not the sample is representative of general population. no, it should not be concluded that the compound is beneficial for the majority of people. the sample size is 20, which is too small to be applied to the general population because the entire population did not participate in the study. no, it should not be concluded that the compound is beneficial for the majority of people. the sample size is 20, which is a very small sample. in addition, there is no information provided as to how the 20 people were chosen so we have no idea if they are representative of the general population.

Answer

# Brief Explanations: A sample size of 20 is small and there's no information on how the 20 - person sample was selected. So, it may not be representative of the general population. # Answer: No, it should not be concluded that the compound is beneficial for the majority of people. The sample size is 20, which is a very small sample. In addition, there is no information provided as to how the 20 people were chosen so we have no idea if they are representative of the general population.