analyzing rhetorical appeals\nas of september 1, 2001, the federal judiciary consisting of supreme, circuit…

analyzing rhetorical appeals\nas of september 1, 2001, the federal judiciary consisting of supreme, circuit and district court judges was about 22% women. in 1992, nearly ten years ago, when i was first appointed a district court judge, the percentage of women in the total federal judiciary was only 13%.\n- \a latina judges voice,\\nsonia sotomayor\nwhat type of appeal does the speaker use in this passage? logos\nhow does the use of this appeal support the authors purpose?\nit uses facts to prove a lack of diversity.\nit cites case studies to prove a lack of diversity.\nit questions values to prove a lack of diversity.

analyzing rhetorical appeals\nas of september 1, 2001, the federal judiciary consisting of supreme, circuit and district court judges was about 22% women. in 1992, nearly ten years ago, when i was first appointed a district court judge, the percentage of women in the total federal judiciary was only 13%.\n- \a latina judges voice,\\nsonia sotomayor\nwhat type of appeal does the speaker use in this passage? logos\nhow does the use of this appeal support the authors purpose?\nit uses facts to prove a lack of diversity.\nit cites case studies to prove a lack of diversity.\nit questions values to prove a lack of diversity.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The passage presents factual data (percentages of women in the federal judiciary in 1992 and 2001) to make a point. Logos is an appeal to logic and reason, which is achieved through presenting facts and data. The first option in the dropdown correctly identifies that using facts (the percentage figures) supports the author's purpose of showing a lack of diversity (as the percentage of women judges, though increased, still may imply under - representation depending on the context of the full speech). The second option about case studies is incorrect as there are no in - depth case studies (individual stories or detailed analyses of specific judicial cases) presented. The third option about questioning values is wrong because the text does not engage in a discussion of values (like fairness, justice in a value - laden sense beyond the factual data).

Answer:

It uses facts to prove a lack of diversity.