the argument makes intuitive sense. if the worst of the worst are removed from the general prison population…

the argument makes intuitive sense. if the worst of the worst are removed from the general prison population and put in isolation, youd expect there to be markedly fewer inmate shankings and attacks on corrections officers. but the evidence doesnt bear this out. perhaps the most careful inquiry into whether supermax prisons decrease violence and disorder was a 2009 analysis examining the experience in three states - arizona, illinois, and minnesota - following the opening of their supermax prisons. the study found that levels of inmate - on - inmate violence were unchanged, and that levels of inmate - on - staff violence changed unpredictably, rising in arizona, falling in illinois, and holding steady in minnesota.\n- \hellhole\\nashley gecan\nin paragraph 25, the writer describes the practice of isolating violent inmates as making \intuitive sense\ primarily to\nconfirm that solitary confinement may be effective in the most extreme situations.\nshow the authors own ambivalence about the use of solitary confinement.\nacknowledge audience members with an opposing perspective on the topic.\nevoke feelings of injustice and betrayal that lead to unsafe prison environments.\nexcuse the cruelty of prison officers who implement solitary confinement.

the argument makes intuitive sense. if the worst of the worst are removed from the general prison population and put in isolation, youd expect there to be markedly fewer inmate shankings and attacks on corrections officers. but the evidence doesnt bear this out. perhaps the most careful inquiry into whether supermax prisons decrease violence and disorder was a 2009 analysis examining the experience in three states - arizona, illinois, and minnesota - following the opening of their supermax prisons. the study found that levels of inmate - on - inmate violence were unchanged, and that levels of inmate - on - staff violence changed unpredictably, rising in arizona, falling in illinois, and holding steady in minnesota.\n- \hellhole\\nashley gecan\nin paragraph 25, the writer describes the practice of isolating violent inmates as making \intuitive sense\ primarily to\nconfirm that solitary confinement may be effective in the most extreme situations.\nshow the authors own ambivalence about the use of solitary confinement.\nacknowledge audience members with an opposing perspective on the topic.\nevoke feelings of injustice and betrayal that lead to unsafe prison environments.\nexcuse the cruelty of prison officers who implement solitary confinement.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The writer first acknowledges that isolating violent inmates seems reasonable to some (the "intuitive sense"). This is to recognize a perspective that some in the audience may hold. Then, the writer presents evidence against this view. So, the purpose is to acknowledge an opposing perspective.

Answer:

C. acknowledge audience members with an opposing perspective on the topic.