when an argument uses emotional appeal appropriately, it: connects to shared human values while remaining…
when an argument uses emotional appeal appropriately, it: connects to shared human values while remaining logically grounded relies on personal experience rather than data replaces evidence with empathy focuses on the writers emotions none of these question 2 (1 point) which best describes a writers purpose in rhetorical terms? to inform the reader of neutral facts to express emotion to present themselves as the authority on the subject to demonstrate superior reasoning skills none of these
Answer
Brief Explanations:
For the first question:
- Emotional appeal in an argument should connect to shared human values. If it relies on personal experience over data, replaces evidence with empathy, or focuses only on the writer's emotions, it's not appropriately used. A good emotional appeal is logically grounded and connects to shared values. For the second question:
- A writer's purpose in rhetorical terms is often more complex than just informing (which can be part of it but not the full purpose in a rhetorical context). Expressing emotion alone is not the main rhetorical purpose. Presenting as authority or demonstrating reasoning skills are also not the over - arching rhetorical purposes. Rhetorical purpose usually involves persuasion, which may include elements like informing, but none of the first four options fully capture it.
Answer:
- Connects to shared human values while remaining logically grounded
- None of these