how does an argumentative thesis differ from an explanatory thesis?\na. the purpose of an argumentative…

how does an argumentative thesis differ from an explanatory thesis?\na. the purpose of an argumentative thesis is to inform rather than persuade.\nb. the facts presented in an argumentative thesis may not be widely known.\nc. the claims made in an argumentative thesis must be debatable.\nd. the claims made in an argumentative thesis are based only on primary sources.

how does an argumentative thesis differ from an explanatory thesis?\na. the purpose of an argumentative thesis is to inform rather than persuade.\nb. the facts presented in an argumentative thesis may not be widely known.\nc. the claims made in an argumentative thesis must be debatable.\nd. the claims made in an argumentative thesis are based only on primary sources.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  • Option A: An argumentative thesis aims to persuade, not just inform. An explanatory thesis is more about informing. So this option is incorrect.
  • Option B: Both argumentative and explanatory theses can present facts (whether widely - known or not). This is not a key difference.
  • Option C: An argumentative thesis makes debatable claims (e.g., "Capital punishment should be abolished" is debatable). An explanatory thesis explains something (e.g., "The process of photosynthesis") which is not typically debatable in the same sense. This is a correct difference.
  • Option D: Argumentative theses can use both primary and secondary sources. This is not a defining difference.

Answer:

C. The claims made in an argumentative thesis must be debatable.