argumentative writing\nthe grammatical errors in this passage are intentional.\n1) one type of expository…

argumentative writing\nthe grammatical errors in this passage are intentional.\n1) one type of expository writing is argumentative. (2) it is when the writer takes a stance on an issue and includes evidence to support his side of the argument. (3) it is imperative for the writer to state his claim on the particular topic. (4) the claim should include his reasons. (5) without reasons the argument is invalid.\n(6) each body paragraph elaborate on each reason mentioned in the claim. (7) in addition, body paragraphs must contain cited text evidence with commentary. (8) the commentary describes how the evidence connects to the claim. (9) should be twice as long as the evidence. (10) even if the evidence is paraphrased, it still needs to be cited. (11) a proper citation in mla format includes the authors last name followed by the page number where the evidence is found.\n(12) to make the argument credible, the writer must also include a counterclaim. (13) this is where he acknowledges the opposite side of his claim with a rebuttal. (14) a rebuttal refutes why the opposing viewpoint is incorrect or flawed.\n(15) once the refutation is complete, it is time for the writer to conclude his argument by summarizing the main points he explained to defend his stance. (16) the conclusion should not repeat. (17) the claim or reasons word-for-word. (18) instead, it should restate the claim and reasons using different verbiage. (19) the last sentence of an argumentative essay should be a call-to-action. (20) it is what inspires the reader to be proactive and make a difference like the writer has suggested.\nwhich is the best way to combine sentences 16 and 17?\na the conclusion should not repeat the claim; or reasons word-for - word.\nb the conclusion should not repeat, the claim or reasons word-for - word.\nc the conclusion should not repeat since the claim or reasons word - for - word.\nd the conclusion should not repeat the claim or reasons word-for - word.

argumentative writing\nthe grammatical errors in this passage are intentional.\n1) one type of expository writing is argumentative. (2) it is when the writer takes a stance on an issue and includes evidence to support his side of the argument. (3) it is imperative for the writer to state his claim on the particular topic. (4) the claim should include his reasons. (5) without reasons the argument is invalid.\n(6) each body paragraph elaborate on each reason mentioned in the claim. (7) in addition, body paragraphs must contain cited text evidence with commentary. (8) the commentary describes how the evidence connects to the claim. (9) should be twice as long as the evidence. (10) even if the evidence is paraphrased, it still needs to be cited. (11) a proper citation in mla format includes the authors last name followed by the page number where the evidence is found.\n(12) to make the argument credible, the writer must also include a counterclaim. (13) this is where he acknowledges the opposite side of his claim with a rebuttal. (14) a rebuttal refutes why the opposing viewpoint is incorrect or flawed.\n(15) once the refutation is complete, it is time for the writer to conclude his argument by summarizing the main points he explained to defend his stance. (16) the conclusion should not repeat. (17) the claim or reasons word-for-word. (18) instead, it should restate the claim and reasons using different verbiage. (19) the last sentence of an argumentative essay should be a call-to-action. (20) it is what inspires the reader to be proactive and make a difference like the writer has suggested.\nwhich is the best way to combine sentences 16 and 17?\na the conclusion should not repeat the claim; or reasons word-for - word.\nb the conclusion should not repeat, the claim or reasons word-for - word.\nc the conclusion should not repeat since the claim or reasons word - for - word.\nd the conclusion should not repeat the claim or reasons word-for - word.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Sentences 16 ("The conclusion should not repeat") and 17 ("the claim or reasons word - for - word") are related in that the second part ("the claim or reasons word - for - word") is the object of what should not be repeated. In English grammar, when combining such sentences, we need to have a proper subject - verb - object structure.

  • Option A: The use of a semicolon is incorrect here as there is no need for a strong separation of two independent clauses in the way it is used.
  • Option B: The comma after "repeat" is incorrect as it disrupts the proper grammatical connection between "repeat" and its object.
  • Option C: The use of "since" is incorrect as it implies a causal relationship that does not exist between "not repeat" and "the claim or reasons word - for - word".
  • Option D: It correctly combines the two ideas into a single sentence with a proper subject ("The conclusion"), verb ("should not repeat"), and object ("the claim or reasons word - for - word").

Answer:

D. The conclusion should not repeat the claim or reasons word - for - word.