which is the best comparison of tone in these two essays on genetically - modified food?\n○ both essays rely…

which is the best comparison of tone in these two essays on genetically - modified food?\n○ both essays rely on pathos and have an angry tone.\n○ both essays rely on pathos and have a chaotic tone.\n○ both essays rely on logos and have a somber tone.\n○ both essays rely on logos and have a serious tone.

which is the best comparison of tone in these two essays on genetically - modified food?\n○ both essays rely on pathos and have an angry tone.\n○ both essays rely on pathos and have a chaotic tone.\n○ both essays rely on logos and have a somber tone.\n○ both essays rely on logos and have a serious tone.

Answer

Answer:

No information about the essays is given, so it's impossible to determine. But if we assume a typical academic - like approach to the topic of genetically modified food, the most likely answer among the options is: D. Both essays rely on logos and have a serious tone.

Brief Explanations:

When discussing genetically modified food in an academic or formal context, writers often use logical reasoning (logos) and maintain a serious tone to present scientific and ethical arguments. Pathos with an angry or chaotic tone is less likely in a formal discussion, and a somber tone is not as common as a serious one when using logos - based arguments.