what best explains why a written argument without transitions might not work?\no the relationship between…

what best explains why a written argument without transitions might not work?\no the relationship between the examples and the conclusion would be unclear and hard to understand.\no the relationship between ideas would lack the appropriate emphasis and logical flow.\no the relationship between the claim, reasons, and evidence would be too vague and wouldnt make sense.\no the relationship between different parts of the argument would be unclear and hard to follow.

what best explains why a written argument without transitions might not work?\no the relationship between the examples and the conclusion would be unclear and hard to understand.\no the relationship between ideas would lack the appropriate emphasis and logical flow.\no the relationship between the claim, reasons, and evidence would be too vague and wouldnt make sense.\no the relationship between different parts of the argument would be unclear and hard to follow.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Transitions in writing connect different parts of an argument, providing logical flow. Without them, the connections between claim - reasons - evidence, ideas, and different argument components become unclear. While other options touch on aspects, the overall lack of clarity in the relationship between different parts of the argument due to absence of transitions is the most comprehensive reason.

Answer:

The relationship between different parts of the argument would be unclear and hard to follow.