what best explains why a written argument without transitions might not work?\nthe relationship between the…

what best explains why a written argument without transitions might not work?\nthe relationship between the examples and the conclusion would be unclear and hard to understand.\nthe relationship between ideas would lack the appropriate emphasis and logical flow.\nthe relationship between the claim, reasons, and evidence would be too vague and wouldnt make sense.\nthe relationship between different parts of the argument would be unclear and hard to follow.

what best explains why a written argument without transitions might not work?\nthe relationship between the examples and the conclusion would be unclear and hard to understand.\nthe relationship between ideas would lack the appropriate emphasis and logical flow.\nthe relationship between the claim, reasons, and evidence would be too vague and wouldnt make sense.\nthe relationship between different parts of the argument would be unclear and hard to follow.

Answer

Answer:

The relationship between different parts of the argument would be unclear and hard to follow.

Brief Explanations:

Transitions connect argument - parts. Without them, the flow is disrupted, making it difficult to follow the overall argument.