claim: zoos should be kept in service because they offer many benefits to the public.\nkey…

claim: zoos should be kept in service because they offer many benefits to the public.\nkey points/reasons:\n1. zoos educate the public about animals and conservation efforts.\n a. there are 241 accredited zoos in the united states that attract over 181 million visitors annually.\n b. these visitors to zoos are exposed to new knowledge of biodiversity and specific individual actions to protect biodiversity.\n2. counterclaim: the benefits of zoos do not outweigh the detrimental effects of keeping animals captive.\nrebuttals to counterclaim:\n a. there is compelling and suggestive evidence that suggests exposure to zoos increases knowledge and engagement in local conservation efforts.\n b. animals in zoos are given great care from veterinarians and receive cutting-edge medicines.\n3. zoos produce helpful scientific research that benefits humanity.\n a. many diseases that are spread from animals to humans are studied and controlled by research conducted and funded by zoos.\n b. zoo research impacts legislation that changes animal protection laws for the better.\nuse the outline to answer the question.\nwhich would be an example of information that may be too detailed to include in a concluding statement?\n(1 point)\nthe benefits of zoos do not outweigh the detrimental effects of keeping animals captive.\nzoos educate the public about animals and conservation efforts.\nzoos produce helpful scientific research that benefits humanity.\nzoo research impacts legislation that changes animal protection laws for the better.

claim: zoos should be kept in service because they offer many benefits to the public.\nkey points/reasons:\n1. zoos educate the public about animals and conservation efforts.\n a. there are 241 accredited zoos in the united states that attract over 181 million visitors annually.\n b. these visitors to zoos are exposed to new knowledge of biodiversity and specific individual actions to protect biodiversity.\n2. counterclaim: the benefits of zoos do not outweigh the detrimental effects of keeping animals captive.\nrebuttals to counterclaim:\n a. there is compelling and suggestive evidence that suggests exposure to zoos increases knowledge and engagement in local conservation efforts.\n b. animals in zoos are given great care from veterinarians and receive cutting-edge medicines.\n3. zoos produce helpful scientific research that benefits humanity.\n a. many diseases that are spread from animals to humans are studied and controlled by research conducted and funded by zoos.\n b. zoo research impacts legislation that changes animal protection laws for the better.\nuse the outline to answer the question.\nwhich would be an example of information that may be too detailed to include in a concluding statement?\n(1 point)\nthe benefits of zoos do not outweigh the detrimental effects of keeping animals captive.\nzoos educate the public about animals and conservation efforts.\nzoos produce helpful scientific research that benefits humanity.\nzoo research impacts legislation that changes animal protection laws for the better.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

A concluding statement should be concise and summarize the main points. "Zoo research impacts legislation that changes animal protection laws for the better" is a detailed example (a sub - point under the main point about zoo research) and is too detailed for a conclusion. The other options are main points or a counterclaim, which are more appropriate for a conclusion's summary level.

Answer:

D. Zoo research impacts legislation that changes animal protection laws for the better.