compare and contrast how carson and laduke support their arguments. include details about the appeals and…

compare and contrast how carson and laduke support their arguments. include details about the appeals and structures of the two texts in your response. both rachel carson and winona laduke talk about protecting the environment, but they do it in different ways. carson uses science and facts to explain how pollution hurts nature, making people trust her through proof and research. laduke, on the other hand, uses emotion and personal stories to show how the environment connects to her culture and community. carson tries to teach people with logic, while laduke reaches people through feelings and values. sample response: ladukes purpose is to have the reader reconsider the value of eliminating darkness in our world. her word choice creates a concerned but encouraging tone. this tone, combined with strong emotional, ethical, and logical appeals, helps her achieve her purpose. on the other hand, carsons tone is more suspenseful and alarmed. she uses word choice that emphasizes danger because her purpose is to alert them to something terrible that is happening but that they cant see. this is likely to appeal to readers sense of fear. what did you include in your response? check all that apply. a statement telling which text was more effective details about word choice and tone details about structure and purpose

Answer