compare the student text with the source. source: ewen callaway, \oldest stone tools raise questions about…

compare the student text with the source. source: ewen callaway, \oldest stone tools raise questions about their creators.\ published in nature 520,7548 (2015). climate upheavals that transformed dense forest into open savannah might have catalysed ancient humans into developing the new technology so that they could hunt or scavenge grass - eating animals, the theory goes. student text: according to one theory, \climate upheavals that transformed dense forest into open savannah\ played a major role in ancient humans development of technology for hunting grass - eating animals (callaway). is the student text plagiarized? no, it is not plagiarized. yes, because it fails to use quotation marks. yes, because it fails to cite the source. yes, because it fails to use quotation marks and fails to cite the source.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
To determine if it's plagiarized, we analyze: The student rephrased the source content (paraphrasing is allowed if cited), and they cited the source (Callaway) and used quotation marks for the direct phrase from the source. So it's not plagiarized.
Answer:
No, it is not plagiarized.