consider this claim: the perfect serving of pancakes is two, because its satisfying but not overly filling…

consider this claim: the perfect serving of pancakes is two, because its satisfying but not overly filling. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the strongest and most reasonable counter - claim to the above claim? pancakes are the best food for breakfast because you can add different fruits or delicious toppings to them. everyone who only eats two pancakes feels hungry again immediately after breakfast. since pancakes are relatively high in fat, calories, and sodium, its best to have a serving of just one.

consider this claim: the perfect serving of pancakes is two, because its satisfying but not overly filling. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the strongest and most reasonable counter - claim to the above claim? pancakes are the best food for breakfast because you can add different fruits or delicious toppings to them. everyone who only eats two pancakes feels hungry again immediately after breakfast. since pancakes are relatively high in fat, calories, and sodium, its best to have a serving of just one.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The original claim is that two pancakes is the perfect serving. The counter - claim should directly oppose this. The first option is about pancakes being a great breakfast food, not about the serving size. The second option says everyone who eats two pancakes gets hungry right after, which directly challenges the idea that two pancakes is a satisfying but not overly - filling serving. The third option suggests one pancake is best but doesn't strongly oppose two being perfect as directly as the second option.

Answer:

Everyone who only eats two pancakes feels hungry again immediately after breakfast.