when developing a counterclaim, you should\no not make your counter - claims evidence closely factual…

when developing a counterclaim, you should\no not make your counter - claims evidence closely factual because you should not undermine your central argument.\no interview people who disagree with your arguments claim in order to understand their opinions.\no thoroughly research the evidence to make sure you understand the facts behind the counterclaim.\no supply personal evidence and experience as to why you disagree with the counterclaim.

when developing a counterclaim, you should\no not make your counter - claims evidence closely factual because you should not undermine your central argument.\no interview people who disagree with your arguments claim in order to understand their opinions.\no thoroughly research the evidence to make sure you understand the facts behind the counterclaim.\no supply personal evidence and experience as to why you disagree with the counterclaim.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

When developing a counter - claim, thorough research of evidence is crucial to understand its basis. Factual evidence for the counter - claim doesn't undermine the central argument; in fact, it shows a comprehensive understanding. Interviewing people can be one part of research but is not the most essential step. Personal evidence may be subjective and less reliable compared to well - researched facts.

Answer:

thoroughly research the evidence to make sure you understand the facts behind the counterclaim.