which of the following ways of thinking about evidence is not likely to help you produce an effective…

which of the following ways of thinking about evidence is not likely to help you produce an effective analytical, thesis - driven paper?\n○ one should be clear and explicit with evidence.\n○ one should use as many sources as possible.\n○ one should move past obvious interpretations.\n○ one should be selective about evidence.

which of the following ways of thinking about evidence is not likely to help you produce an effective analytical, thesis - driven paper?\n○ one should be clear and explicit with evidence.\n○ one should use as many sources as possible.\n○ one should move past obvious interpretations.\n○ one should be selective about evidence.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In an analytical, thesis - driven paper, clarity and explicitness with evidence ((1^{st}) option) helps in making the argument clear. Moving past obvious interpretations ((3^{rd}) option) allows for deeper analysis. Being selective about evidence ((4^{th}) option) ensures that only relevant and strong evidence is used. However, using as many sources as possible ((2^{nd}) option) can lead to a paper that is unfocused. Quantity of sources does not equate to quality of analysis.

Answer:

One should use as many sources as possible.