which footnote is formatted correctly?\n2garrow 403–04 tells readers how king knew at the start of the…

which footnote is formatted correctly?\n2garrow 403–04 tells readers how king knew at the start of the second attempt that he would cut the march short, but did not inform most of the marchers or even all of the leaders of his plan, which led many in the movement to briefly criticize king.\n2. see garrow 403–04 for criticisms of king for cutting the march short\n2. for a detailed account of the criticisms king faced for ending the march, see garrow 403–04.\n2for an account of the criticisms king faced for cutting the march short and not sharing his plan with others in the movement, see garrow, 403–04.

which footnote is formatted correctly?\n2garrow 403–04 tells readers how king knew at the start of the second attempt that he would cut the march short, but did not inform most of the marchers or even all of the leaders of his plan, which led many in the movement to briefly criticize king.\n2. see garrow 403–04 for criticisms of king for cutting the march short\n2. for a detailed account of the criticisms king faced for ending the march, see garrow 403–04.\n2for an account of the criticisms king faced for cutting the march short and not sharing his plan with others in the movement, see garrow, 403–04.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In academic writing, a footnote typically starts with a superscript number followed by a brief description and citation. The first option has incorrect formatting as the superscript number is not in the right place relative to the text start. The second option lacks the superscript number. The third option has the number as a regular number instead of superscript. The fourth option has the correct superscript number placement and proper citation format.

Answer:

2For an account of the criticisms King faced for cutting the march short and not sharing his plan with others in the movement, see Garrow, 403–04.