formatting footnotes properly\nking was assassinated on april 4, 1968, just weeks before the poor peoples…

formatting footnotes properly\nking was assassinated on april 4, 1968, just weeks before the poor peoples campaign was scheduled to begin. leadership of the campaign became fractured,¹ and, though the campaign took place as scheduled, it resulted in no major effects and ultimately was deemed a failure.\n1. see viorst: 437–39 for an analysis of how the campaign devolved after kings assassination\nwhat should be corrected in the footnote? check all that apply.\n□ three more line spaces should be added before the footnote.\n□ the number 1 should be written in a superscript.\n□ there should be no punctuation after the authors name.\n□ the page numbers should be written \437/39.\\n□ there needs to be a period at the end.

formatting footnotes properly\nking was assassinated on april 4, 1968, just weeks before the poor peoples campaign was scheduled to begin. leadership of the campaign became fractured,¹ and, though the campaign took place as scheduled, it resulted in no major effects and ultimately was deemed a failure.\n1. see viorst: 437–39 for an analysis of how the campaign devolved after kings assassination\nwhat should be corrected in the footnote? check all that apply.\n□ three more line spaces should be added before the footnote.\n□ the number 1 should be written in a superscript.\n□ there should be no punctuation after the authors name.\n□ the page numbers should be written \437/39.\\n□ there needs to be a period at the end.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In academic writing, footnote numbers should be superscripted. Also, a period is typically needed at the end of a footnote. There is no need for specific formatting like "437/39" for page - numbers and punctuation after the author's name is common. Adding three more line - spaces before a footnote is not a standard requirement.

Answer:

The number 1 should be written in a superscript. There needs to be a period at the end.